The world of recruitment has changed quickly over the last 18 months, and many ATS systems have evolved in response. Moreover, the biggest shift involves the rise of artificial intelligence and its growing impact on hiring. So how does AI affect hiring today, and what impact might it have in the future? According to BCG and the Financial Times, 51% of UK business leaders plan to invest in AI over hiring. Additionally, 57% expect to hire fewer people in 2025.
As a result, hiring teams must adapt to new AI tools and integrate them into daily workflows. Teams that embrace AI and automation gain a clear competitive edge across several recruitment areas. They can also build scalable processes without harming candidate experience or adding manual work.
However, while SeeMeHired offers basic ATS features and an appealing price, it lacks strong automation and integrated AI capability. Consequently, mid-market teams may fall behind competitors using more modern ATS platforms.
Therefore, mid-market teams seeking responsible AI, powerful automation, and scalable processes should review the options we summarise below.
Let’s get started. 👇
Table of Contents
Occy
Who’s it best for?
Occy is a great fit for UK mid-market businesses who are looking to onboard an ATS that prioritises a powerful feature set with a highly customisable automation builder. Occy’s platform is easy to use, doesn’t come with a steep learning curve and provides an extensive integrated feature set alongside a focus on people-led customer support.
Why choose Occy over SeeMeHired?
As a SeeMeHired alternative, Occy offers a far broader feature set that helps teams achieve more with fewer resources. Moreover, our AI focuses on reducing admin rather than replacing human judgment. We streamline admin-heavy hiring tasks by combining automation and AI to support job descriptions, candidate communication, and summary creation.
In addition, we keep people at the centre of recruitment by allowing hiring teams to apply their expertise without overwhelming admin. Therefore, we design features that promote ethical AI and empower users in every stage of hiring. SeeMeHired does provide integration and setup support, but it costs four figures and may take up to eight weeks.
By contrast, Occy configures your ATS for free and completes onboarding within four weeks. Finally, our onboarding is guided by real people rather than static articles.
Key Features
- Fully customisable and automated workflows that can be built in a few clicks and don’t require weeks of effort to get up and running
- Ethically implemented AI features that support the hiring process and reduce manual workload without compromising explainability or introducing unwanted bias
- Customer service that’s people-first, with the same gold standard of service for all customers regardless of their company size or contract value
How does SeeMeHired’s pricing work?
SeeMeHired doesn’t publish pricing on its website, and there are a lack of reviews or customers who have given an indication into what pricing model the platform uses. It’s worth noting that implementation isn’t included in the subscription price, and reportedly costs roughly 25 – 33% of an annual subscription as a one off fee.
At Occy, we provide an expanded feature set, but at a fixed cost.. We don’t believe that teams should have their hiring strategies limited by pricing tiers, especially when budgets are tight and spending must be constantly justified against ROI.
Occy also has consistently lower costs for teams looking to purchase advertising media, We find that we save our customers a minimum of 15% on their media when buying from us rather than directly from job boards, and considerably higher savings when compared to other ATS platforms.
Teamtailor
Who’s it best for?
Teamtailor is a great fit for international enterprise businesses with over 5,000 employees, or mid market businesses who have an existing hiring tech stack that they’d like to continue to use alongside their ATS.
Businesses who prefer Teamtailor typically place more value on brand-led recruiting, without building ultra-technical recruitment workflows or crafting a customised ATS to fit their specific needs.
Key Features
- Co-pilot helps improve recruiter productivity through the use of generative AI
- Broad integration capabilities with over 400 apps and platforms currently supportedÂ
- CRM functionality and talent pooling facilitates automated candidate nurturing
Key Considerations
- Implementation support depends heavily on company size, with businesses under 5,000 employees often left with knowledge base articles to resolve issues
- Configuration and setup of the Teamtailor platform averages 4 months from the beginning of your contract, posing an issue around slow time to value
- Platform loading speed and unresolved bugs have been frequently mentioned in Trustpilot reviews, indicating frustrations within Teamtailor’s customer base
Pricing
Teamtailor doesn’t list pricing tiers on their website, but available reviews detail a model that isn’t clear and contains many hidden costs. Teamtailor’s website advertises a deep feature set, though many of those features are accessed through add ons (some core functionality like data import and calendar connections are at extra cost) or the integrated marketplace.
Whilst the number of integrations is impressive and gives users access to a wide feature base, this comes at a cost as additional annual subscriptions start to add up and ROI justification becomes more difficult for hiring and HR leaders whose budgets are hard pressed.
Talos360
Who’s it best for?
Talos 360 is a great fit for larger businesses who have a complex hiring process and the need for a fully configured ATS, including a broad feature set and integrations with many popular HRIS platforms. Talos 360 is also a good fit for the public sector, where their G-Cloud 14 accreditation can help pass procurement processes.
However, the configurability comes at a price with a modular structure increasing the cost of the platform significantly when desirable features such as video profiling and career site builds are both priced at 4 figures options on top of a standard subscription.
Mid-market teams that are budget conscious or need a platform that can be configured quickly will have better options in the market, with similar feature sets for a lower cost.
Key Features
- Configurable platform with a broad feature set supporting varied hiring processes
- Agency portals and PSL provide an integrated way to work with external parties
- Strong analytics capabilities, providing teams with granular reporting into performance
Key Considerations
- AI implementation is shifting into an ethically grey area, where algorithms and models look to replace many core responsibilities of hiring managers
- Modular platform structure provides flexibility, but also significant complexity causing configuration projects to take roughly 4 months before value is realised
- Customer service is tiered, and as Talos 360 begins to focus on the enterprise segment, mid-market customers may find the service level inadequate for their needs
Pricing
Talos360 uses a modular pricing structure, and whilst the idea of a highly configured package sounds good on paper, it often leads to contact values skyrocketing once the desired feature sets are built into a contract.
Whilst Talos 360 also gives users access to media buying versus going directly to job boards, we’ve found that packages are relatively expensive (Occy saves teams a considerable amount on media buying versus Talos 360’s quoted prices).
Overall, Talos 360 provides a highly configurable and connected ATS, but that comes at a significant premium compared to other options in the market, especially for teams that are looking to support candidate attraction with media advertising.
Greenhouse
Who’s it best for?
Greenhouse is the benchmark ATS for enterprise customers seeking a consistent, robust hiring process across international teams.
It suits organisations with the time and resources to complete a complex implementation process.
With a deep feature set, strong analytics, and a wide integration ecosystem, Greenhouse is popular among larger businesses.
It provides a highly configurable ATS that supports a structured, global hiring process.
Key Features
- Broad feature set and structured hiring processes improve governance
- Largest integration network with over 500 apps and an open API
- Robust analytics package with highly customisable dashboards and reports
Key Considerations
- Implementation is heavier than most options, with configuration and training often taking a few months (extending further with additional tech stack integrations)
- Many features are locked behind the higher tier platform packages, meaning that teams opting for lower tier pricing don’t get access to the newest ATS features
- Customer service is limited to knowledge base articles and text support without paying for the highest product tiers, leaving many users to fend for themselves
Pricing
Greenhouse doesn’t publish pricing, though packages are reported to be on the higher end of typical ATS costs.
Lower-tier plans may cost similarly to other platforms but offer fewer features and less support.
Pricing also depends on company size. Mid-market businesses with a few hundred employees can expect contracts in the mid five figures.
These estimates do not include additional costs, such as advertising media.
Pinpoint
Who’s it best for?
Similarly to Teamtailor, Pinpoint works well for internal hiring teams that focus on employer branding.
It also suits teams building bespoke hiring processes across multiple functions or departments.
Pinpoint uses automation to support candidate communication, team notifications, and basic candidate management.
However, teams seeking AI integration or fast implementation may prefer other platforms.
Key Features
- Best in class career site builder and employer branding toolkit
- Automation builder that supports function specific workflows
- Equality reporting is a larger focus in Pinpoint compared to other ATS platforms
Key Considerations
- Implementation heavily varies based on the complexity of the organisation, with some complex projects taking up to 6 months before the platform is completely configured
- Whilst the automation builder is effective, it takes a significant amount of time to get up and running and workflows built to support the hiring process
- Pinpoint’s AI features don’t extend to generative AI, meaning that email templates and communications still need to be written manually, making automation less scalable
Pricing
Pinpoint doesn’t publish pricing on their website, and requires a meeting to receive a quote. However, reported pricing is on the higher end of the ATS market, with some of Pinpoint’s features locked behind an Enterprise tier which starts at five figures per year.
Whilst pricing is relatively high, there’s a lack of customisation within the system, indicating that teams with a larger budget may get more for their money elsewhere.
Â
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop)
Who’s it best for?
With Cezanne’s recent acquisition of Occupop, the platform is now rebranded as Cezanne Recruitment.
Their ATS focuses on small businesses, offering a simple platform that can be implemented quickly, sometimes within 24 hours.
Cezanne Recruitment suits small businesses and organisations seeking a straightforward solution to organise hiring quickly.
However, it lacks advanced automation and features that provide scalability or customisation like other ATS platforms.
Key Features
- Fast implementation time supported by onboarding and support teams
- Simple and intuitive UX that doesn’t require much training to use
- Practical, yet basic feature set that doesn’t require complex set up to get started
Key Considerations
- Automation and nurture campaigns are under-developed, making the platform less scalable for businesses that are growing, or have larger hiring demands
- Integrations are weak, with most of the available connections related to general productivity platforms such as Microsoft Teams, or employee benefit platforms
- For teams that aren’t using Cezanne’s HRIS, the platform may feel less future-proof given the lack of available integrations with other common HRTech.
Pricing
Given the recent acquisition, Cezanne Recruitment doesn’t publish pricing, making costs difficult to gauge.
Previous customers reported that Occupop’s basic package cost the mid four figures per year. Since the platform targets small businesses, this estimate may still be accurate.
For small businesses buying their first ATS, or teams already using Cezanne’s HRIS, Cezanne Recruitment offers an attractive option. However, teams with complex hiring processes or long-term ATS plans will likely find better alternatives.
Disclaimer
All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. The information provided here is based on publicly available sources and user reviews at the time of writing. Features, pricing, and capabilities may change without notice. We make no guarantee about the completeness or accuracy of this information. For the latest details or to confirm specific features, please refer to the official vendor website or speak with their representatives. This comparison is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an endorsement or legal advice.