It’s a challenging time to be in recruitment. Budget constraints remain a top concern. A recent survey showed a 76% increase in HR professionals citing budget as their main issue for 2025. Recruitment challenges ranked a close second.
Given these pressures, what does the future of recruitment look like, and how can teams do more with less? According to BCG and the Financial Times, AI and automation will play a key role. Fifty-one percent of UK business leaders plan to invest in AI rather than hire more staff.
Hiring professionals must adapt to new AI-enabled tools and integrate them into daily processes. Consequently, hiring leaders need to select tools carefully. They should prioritise cost, ease of implementation, and sufficient configuration support to adopt technology responsibly.
While Pinpoint has an attractive UI and strong brand, it lacks essential generative AI features that reduce manual tasks like writing job descriptions or crafting candidate communications. Pinpoint’s pricing is also high for ATS platforms, with some features locked behind an Enterprise tier.
Teams seeking a budget-friendly ATS with strong features and practical AI integration may find better options. To help, we have summarised six alternatives suitable for mid-market teams looking for a new platform.
Let’s get started. 👇
Table of Contents
Occy
Who’s it best for?
Occy is ideal for UK mid-market businesses because they want an ATS with a powerful feature set and customisable automation builder.
Additionally, the platform is easy to use, requires little learning, and offers integrated features along with people-led customer support.
Why choose Occy over Pinpoint?
Occy covers most of Pinpoint’s features, but our AI empowers teams to achieve more with less.
Moreover, both platforms offer strong automation builders, yet Occy speeds up workflow creation with generative AI assistance.
Specifically, generative AI helps write job descriptions and candidate communications quickly, saving teams time and effort.
Furthermore, Pinpoint’s features are tiered, limiting access without an Enterprise subscription.
In contrast, Occy provides all features to everyone via a flat, budget-friendly pricing model.
Therefore, customers can access everything our platform offers, creating hiring processes without extra costs.
Similarly, both platforms provide implementation services, but Occy fully configures and trains teams within four weeks.
Importantly, onboarding at Occy is guided by people, not articles, ensuring faster, personalised setup.
On the other hand, Pinpoint reviews indicate onboarding can take up to six months for complex integrations.
Key Features
Fully customisable workflows built in a few clicks, so teams launch quickly.
Ethically implemented AI reduces manual workload while remaining explainable and unbiased.
People-first customer service provides consistent support, regardless of company size or contract value.
How does Pinpoint’s pricing work?
Pinpoint doesn’t publish pricing; a quote requires a meeting. Consequently, costs are high compared to most ATS platforms.Moreover, some features are only available in the Enterprise plan, starting at five figures per year.Despite high pricing, the system lacks customisation, meaning complex teams may not get full value.
In comparison, Occy consistently offers lower costs for advertising media, saving customers at least 15% compared to job boards.
Additionally, savings are often significantly higher when compared to many other ATS providers.
Teamtailor
Who’s it best for?
Teamtailor is a great fit for international enterprise businesses with over 5,000 employees.
It also suits mid-market businesses that want to continue using their existing hiring tech stack alongside their ATS.
Businesses who prefer Teamtailor usually value brand-led recruiting.
They are less focused on building complex workflows or fully customised ATS setups.
Key Features
Co-pilot improves recruiter productivity through generative AI.
Broad integration capabilities include over 400 supported apps and platforms.
CRM functionality and talent pooling enable automated candidate nurturing.
Key Considerations
Implementation support varies with company size, leaving smaller businesses to rely on knowledge base articles.
Configuration and setup typically take about four months from contract start, delaying time to value.
Platform loading speed and unresolved bugs are frequently mentioned in Trustpilot reviews, causing user frustrations.
Pricing
Teamtailor does not list pricing tiers online. Reviews suggest a model with unclear and hidden costs.
Many features require add-ons or the integrated marketplace, including core functionality like data import or calendar connections.
While integrations are extensive, additional annual subscriptions can accumulate, making ROI justification challenging for HR leaders with tight budgets.
Talos360
Who’s it best for?
Talos 360 is a great fit for larger businesses who have a complex hiring process and the need for a fully configured ATS, including a broad feature set and integrations with many popular HRIS platforms. Talos 360 is also a good fit for the public sector, where their G-Cloud 14 accreditation can help pass procurement processes.
However, the configurability comes at a price with a modular structure increasing the cost of the platform significantly when desirable features such as video profiling and career site builds are both priced at 4 figures options on top of a standard subscription.
Mid-market teams that are budget conscious or need a platform that can be configured quickly will have better options in the market, with similar feature sets for a lower cost.
Key Features
- Configurable platform with a broad feature set supporting varied hiring processes
- Agency portals and PSL provide an integrated way to work with external parties
- Strong analytics capabilities, providing teams with granular reporting into performance
Key Considerations
- AI implementation is shifting into an ethically grey area, where algorithms and models look to replace many core responsibilities of hiring managers
- Modular platform structure provides flexibility, but also significant complexity causing configuration projects to take roughly 4 months before value is realised
- Customer service is tiered, and as Talos 360 begins to focus on the enterprise segment, mid-market customers may find the service level inadequate for their needs
Pricing
Talos360 uses a modular pricing structure, and whilst the idea of a highly configured package sounds good on paper, it often leads to contact values skyrocketing once the desired feature sets are built into a contract.
Whilst Talos 360 also gives users access to media buying versus going directly to job boards, we’ve found that packages are relatively expensive (Occy saves teams a considerable amount on media buying versus Talos 360’s quoted prices).
Overall, Talos 360 provides a highly configurable and connected ATS, but that comes at a significant premium compared to other options in the market, especially for teams that are looking to support candidate attraction with media advertising.
Greenhouse
Who’s it best for?
Greenhouse is the benchmark ATS for enterprise customers who are looking to build a consistent and robust hiring process across international teams, with the resources and time to work through a complex implementation process
With a deep feature set, strong analytics and a wide integration ecosystem, Greenhouse is a common choice for larger businesses who are looking for a highly configurable ATS to provide a structured, global hiring process.
Key Features
- Broad feature set and structured hiring processes improve governance
- Largest integration network with over 500 apps and an open API
- Robust analytics package with highly customisable dashboards and reports
Key Considerations
- Implementation is heavier than most options, with configuration and training often taking a few months (extending further with additional tech stack integrations)
- Many features are locked behind the higher tier platform packages, meaning that teams opting for lower tier pricing don’t get access to the newest ATS features
- Customer service is limited to knowledge base articles and text support without paying for the highest product tiers, leaving many users to fend for themselves
Pricing
Greenhouse doesn’t publish pricing on its website, though packages are reported to be on the higher end of what prospects should expect to pay for an ATS platform. Lower end pricing tiers can be similar to other platforms, but with less features and support compared to many alternatives on the market.
Pricing is also based on company size, where mid-market businesses with a few hundred employees can easily expect their contract value to rise into the mid five figures without additional costs such as advertising media included.
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop)
Who’s it best for?
With Cezanne’s recent acquisition of Occupop, the platform has now been rebranded as Cezanne Recruitment. Their ATS focuses on catering to small businesses, offering a simple platform that can be implemented quickly (within 24 hours according to their website).
Cezanne recruitment is a great fit for small businesses and organisations that are looking for a simple solution to help quickly organise their hiring process, without the deep feature set or automation workflows that help ATS platforms provide scalability and customisation.
Key Features
- Fast implementation time supported by onboarding and support teams
- Simple and intuitive UX that doesn’t require much training to use
- Practical, yet basic feature set that doesn’t require complex set up to get started
Key Considerations
- Automation and nurture campaigns are under-developed, making the platform less scalable for businesses that are growing, or have larger hiring demands
- Integrations are weak, with most of the available connections related to general productivity platforms such as Microsoft Teams, or employee benefit platforms
- For teams that aren’t using Cezanne’s HRIS, the platform may feel less future-proof given the lack of available integrations with other common HRTech.
Pricing
Given the recent acquisition, pricing is difficult to gauge and isn’t published on Cezanne Recruitment’s website. Previous customers have indicated that Occupop’s basic package was in the mid four figures per year, and given that the platform mostly targets small businesses, this may still be correct.
For small businesses who are looking to purchase their first ATS or teams that are already using Cezanne’s HRIS, Cezanne Recruitment is an attractive option. However, for teams that have more complex hiring processes or are purchasing an ATS with the future in mind, there are likely better options.
SeeMeHired
Who’s it best for?
SeeMeHired is a basic platform that’s best suited for small businesses who are looking to onboard their first ATS, particularly in industries such as hospitality and healthcare where compliance is a greater concern.
For internal teams who are only looking for the basic functionality of an ATS; the ability to post to job boards, collect CVs and schedule video interviews, SeeMeHired can perform adequately, However, for teams that are looking to scale their hiring process through automation and through the usage of AI, there are better options on the market.
Key Features
- Clean interface that’s easy to use and mobile friendly
- Integrated video tool allows teams to use the ATS for end-to-end hiring
- Candidate portal brings transparency to the hiring process
Key Considerations
- The platform is missing automation within its functionality, limiting the ability to create scalable processes using SeeMeHired
- There’s a lack of customisation for teams who have complexity in their hiring process, making it unsuitable for mature hiring functions
- SeeMeHired doesn’t integrate with other software outside of job boards, preventing it from becoming a core part of a connected tech stack and ecosystem
Pricing
SeeMeHired doesn’t publish pricing on its website, and there are a lack of reviews or customers who have given an indication into what pricing model the platform uses. It’s worth noting that implementation isn’t included in the subscription price, and reportedly costs roughly 25 – 33% of an annual subscription as a one off fee.
To receive a personalised quote, contact the team through their website.
Disclaimer
All product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. The information provided here is based on publicly available sources and user reviews at the time of writing. Features, pricing, and capabilities may change without notice. We make no guarantee about the completeness or accuracy of this information. For the latest details or to confirm specific features, please refer to the official vendor website or speak with their representatives. This comparison is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an endorsement or legal advice.